cheese bans, more than just "protecting people"?

Do you think that laws like the raw cheese or mimolette bans are being reinforced currently simply to keep people safe or to punish cheese connoisseurs? Laws like that are designed to destroy the American dream that is what that is about, destroying peoples will. Destroying peoples hopes and dreams. Giving them a forbidden fruit like desire for something they will never get. Same idea behind prohibition and probably part of the reason for our current addiction problem. It brings these things, mere commodity's to legendary status in the people. But that's just conjecture, isn't it.

The difference between Spice(K2), JWH and and actual herbal incence, more media misconception

Spice, or k2 used to consist solely of natural herbs, is all spice banned? yes. This law is bigoted and short minded and they have painted misconceptions and lies about this product. If there were companies lacing their product with jwh they should have punished those sellers not banned a product in it's entirety and had media blitzkriegs that are comparable to how buffoons act.

Monopoly on knowledge and control of personal sustainability, and in part a response to an RT article

There is a difference between consumer protections and holding a market accountable, lot's of people abuse consumer protections. I don't think it's the flavors. It will always be a wild west to some point. E-cigarettes are vaporizers. The attitude conveyed in this interview reminds me slightly of MSM's attitude. How it's the object, or the person and not about the freedom to choose. I think the truth project should stay where they do best, attacking those companies, or do they want to go into attacking the consumer and their rights? Like bloomberg with his 20 dollar cigarettes. That is market abuse. Truth markets extremes and polarization of the issues just as much as the big tobacco companies. You want real answers, freedom is your answer, when consumers know what they are buying and can make or order their own vaporizer then they will not rely strictly as you put it, on the big tobacco companies.That is why i think that our governments actions are wrong because the attack on rights leads to these problems. If you are forced to consume and consume what others produce for you then you are trapped in a loop of never being able to produce for yourself.(never knowing that you can, or how to.) I believe that if we had never strayed from washboards and agricultural tools as well as community wide agriculture we wouldn't have these problems. You see, you take the rights of people away through product bans, driving up prices or writing laws against private means of production of basic necessity's and lead people away from their heritage. They did it with shiny cars and the advent of loans in the 60's. The new car loan is now student debt. when you keep someone in a  cycle of debt it messes with their ability to make good decisions. Therefore you see this debt crisis. They don't care then and they figure they would rather give up and spend them and their family into a hole then die unhappy. It's like the story of the company store. The idea is that the means of production belong to the state. One is not allowed means of production, only through the education system are we given knowledge of self sustainability. We have become a nation in which means of production are controlled by the state, through the education system. Only once you get a degree may you be allowed the knowledge with which you desire to pursue your goals in life. WE will hold the knowledge you desire hostage if you do not play our game and go through our hoops and learn the subjects we want you to, in the way with which we want you to.  If i do not graduate I will not get a degree, If I do not get a degree I will not get a job, if I do not get a job I will fail. No other options. Monopoly on knowledge, thought control.

Link to Story:  [410] New Earthly Species, Crashing the Koch Party & Big Tobacco's E-Cig Takeover

Mycoremediation

Mycoremediation Wiki-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycoremediation

Mainstream Media a discriminatory force

Ever since childhood I have seen media deception and their taking and leaving facts about different groups of people and different life preferences(like collectors, with shows like hoarders, free speech, freedom of religion with things like plant bans(The attack on salvia is a great example), trying to ban guns, attacking autistic people and numerous other attacks that quite frankly showed bigotry and lack of real knowledge on or about the subject with which they were covering) out of their stories then turning to demonize those groups, it has always given me an uneasy feeling, because I always knew that they were doing something wrong(deceptive). Many do not because of lack of knowledge about how much the the attacks, legislation that comes after their attack's and defamatory, uncontextual behavior harms different groups ability to exist or even pursue their dreams. They have apathy even if they don't buy the lie. They have taken the very soul of America and tried to gut it from the inside out through legislation based on defamatory statements. That quite frankly in my opinion should be illegal and they should lose their ability to broadcast such statements, permanently. For the educated American or any American seeking to educate themselves or wanting to enjoy life or chase the pursuit of happiness the mainstream media is a blight.

criminality by MSM

I think that the reason that our media prints such defamatory stories about the groups of people they have already hurt to a large degree is because maybe they fear prosecution and being called what they are. Criminals. They support discrimination, they have caused much suffering for many groups of people. The best way to not be liable for that is to do what? create a overall negative opinion of that group of people. It's a criminality.

Was anyone who was watching the media surrounding occupy beforehand all the way until it was over notice how MSM approached it? How they didn't approach it at all until the situation was under control for them and the spirit of the movement had been crushed. They can stop that movement, but they cannot stop people from witnessing their crimes. They cannot stop people from talking about it. Unless they break the law.

Nostalgia complex, a new word

Many people have a nostalgia complex that MSM abuses. The "nostalgia complex" is one of the issues that we are dealing with as a society. I am creating this word. The definition of nostalgia complex is, having a nostalgic view of the world, viewing things in life from a third person or joking perspective, having a joking attitude towards life. Applying movie logic to everyday life.(something that MSM try's to impose with fictional or harmful statements all the time.) Creating false perceptions in the world. False narratives or ideas of how things really work. Look at prohibition for example. Based on false or fear based "nostalgic" narratives.

Tools of oppression, a spiritualists take on the issue

Government is a way of cracking down on unpopular speech, psychiatry is a way of cracking down on unpopular thought.

Psychiatry is a way of re-contextualizing what another human being says in a negative manner to portray them in an unfavorable light. It is simply a tool of controlling, oppressive people to talk down to others. It is also a profession that props up bigotry and uses misunderstanding as a form of discrimination. It is a profession that has been used to attack the autistic community, certain religious beliefs, veterans and disenfranchised youth struggling with abusive parents.
Believe it is a tool of satanism.

 Any tool that is used by government that is top down or in my opinion condescending is a tool of oppression. When you put the lives(and souls) of others into the hands of other imperfect human beings you are committing an evil act.

A new Dark ages?

A terrorist should be a person who uses a government regulatory body to chill free speech, someone who causes pain and suffering in community's by attacking individuals for their sincerely held religious beliefs, the news broadcaster who abuses their authority to spread hate for a vulnerable group of individuals or to force their political opinions onto others without their consent(socialism or communism). As well as what it is supposed to be for, overseas conflict and foreign threats. Do we really want to start to initiate this wording into being acceptable as a label for domestic criminals? Do you want us all to go there as a nation and start playing word games like that? If anything is a threat to our nation it is that. I hope that is realized before we go down a steep road into another dark ages, a new era of witch trials.

The mislabeling of anonymous as a terrorist group and the NDAA. Bad things to allow in a free country

Ask yourself this. Why did the government automatically jump to calling the group anonymous terrorists for simple criminal acts. Ask yourself why the word terrorist was abused to attack a group of people simply fed up with the spread of communism and constant infringements on the right to assembly in America. Ask yourself why they were labeled as terrorists when they should have been labeled as criminals. Would it have been OK to have called MLK a terrorist? It's a communist word used to disrespect and bypass our nations principles as well as it's founding documents. Does anyone buy the rhetoric anymore. Should we allow such rhetoric and defamatory language by media and officials in our nation?We should voice our dislike of language such as that to our representatives, media as well as our friends and family's.

Anonymous, a simple activist group which sometimes broke laws as civil disobedience just as Martin Luther King did was labeled a terrorist group. Afraid of the implications of the NDAA yet? Maybe the fact that our state run media of which controls what the people in our nations first impression of different groups is socialist will get your attention. Will you be next? Socialists are known for attacking cultural customs, free speech, collectors(hoarders as they put it) as well as many other disadvantaged groups without a voice. They disenfranchise innocent Americans. Will you speak out against the NDAA?